Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
  • 3 Day Forecast 2.0 
    Family Snowman Contest
    Current Conditions in Little Rock:
    27° WIND CHILL: 16°
    WIND HUMIDITY
    14 WNW 58%

    Tue
    35°

    Wed
    38°

    Thu
    37°
    Sponsored by
  • Marketplace Widget 
    Pay Half
    Jobs
    The Pantry: Rustic European Cuisine
    $50.00 Gift Certificate for $25.00

    Shorty Small’s
    $50.00 Gift Certificate for $25.00

    Delicious Temptations
    $50.00 Gift Certificate for $25.00

    TGI Friday’s
    $50.00 Gift Certificate for $25.00

    Hot Springs Oyster Bar
    $50.00 Gift Certificate for $25.00

    Business
    Classifieds
  • Your Opinion 
    Winter Weather

    With this latest round of winter weather, how do you feel about the snow we've been getting?
     I don't like it at all.
     It's nice, but I'm ready for Spring.
     I love it! Bring on more snow!

     

    View Results
    View Other Polls
  • NEW: Just Pay Half 

    Signup for Deals!

  • Community Calendar 
    «- February 2010
    S M T W T F S
     1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28       
  • Interior - Small 
  • Coal-Burning Power Plant Debate  
    Reported by: Mallory Hardin, KARK 4 News

    Wednesday, Jan 23, 2008 @10:12pm CST

    A new coal-burning plant could bring hundreds of jobs to the natural state.  But one local group says it could also bring toxins and chemicals that could be harmful to Arkansans health, and the environment.


    Arkansas already has a few coal-burning plants, and now SWEPCO is planning on building a new one near Texarkana.


    The John W. Turk coal burning power plant in southwest Arkansas would provide electricity for around 600,000 homes if built, but the Sierra club says power isn't the only thing it will bring.


    "Coal fire power plants emit carbon dioxide, which is a main component of global warming," Glen Hooks Regional Representative for The Sierra Club said.  
     

    Sierra Club representative Glen Hooks says it also emits poisons, such as mercury, which causes birth defects.


    "It gets in your water and in the soil and can be real bad for Arkansans," Hooks said.  


    That's why he, and other Arkansans are working to stop the plant before it comes. Wednesday night they met to make video postcards to send to the governor, asking not to bring any more coal burning plants.


    "We are the natural state. It's not the place where we need to put more carbon monoxide and more poisons into our air and water," Hooks said.


    But SWEPCO representatives disagree.  They say the plant meets the state's environmental standards, and will bring around 1,400 jobs to southwest Arkansas.


    "We understand their position. We also believe coal has to be a part of America’s energy mix," SWEPCO representative Mike Young said.


    They say by using something called ultra supercritical generation in this plant, they're reducing emissions and fuel consumption.


    "We believe the plant is a valuable resource. It will bring a lot of jobs to this area. We have a long record at SWEPCO of environmental stewardship," Young said.

    Comment on this news story
  • Search Classifieds 
    Category:
    Keyword:

  • Classfieds Recent Items 
  • Value Click 
  • Live Stream 
    There are no active stories to display. Please check back later.
  • Interior - Tower 
  •  
  • Interior Tower B